Home Covid-19 Why targeting Trump by going easy on Biden is insane for journalists

Why targeting Trump by going easy on Biden is insane for journalists

A new argument over whether Joe Biden or Donald Trump has gotten worse media coverage should not turn on obscure algorithms.

A more serious debate about whether the media needs to go easier on Biden is actually pretty troubling.

I’ve covered dozens of studies over coverage being declared positive, negative or neutral, and here’s the key fact: These studies can be useful as a rough gauge, but fail to account for tone and intensity.

Consider: A story that says “Joe Biden is sliding in the polls as he grapples with multiple crises and his agenda is stalled on Capitol Hill” would be scored negative.

And a story that says “Donald Trump is a racist, misogynist and psychopath who is determined to destroy this country” would also be scored negative.

But there’s obviously no comparison. The vast majority of even the toughest stories on the incumbent president might challenge his competence but not his character.


Many of the stories on the former president — to this day — depict him as a fascist who would stop at nothing to install himself as a dictator.

Catching fire

The subject caught fire when Dana Milbank, a liberal Washington Post columnist, used data from an outfit called Fiscal Note to argue that Biden’s coverage for the last four months has been as bad as — and at times worse than — the coverage of Trump for the same four months last year.

Journalism is being undermined by a belief among some that reporters need to be activists, supporting either Donald Trump or Joe Biden.
(Getty Images)

Data guru Nate Silver says many of the Biden stories are “totally random. Lots of stories about the stock market. Many have nothing to do with Biden at all (‘Haiti President Assassinated At Home, Wife Wounded’).”

But just for the sake of argument, let’s assume the analysis was accurate. This is Milbank’s conclusion:

“My colleagues in the media are serving as accessories to the murder of democracy.”

Yep, Milbank pivots from saying the press is being too hard on Biden to the press is screwing America.

“We need a skeptical, independent press. But how about being partisans for democracy? The country is in an existential struggle between self-governance and an authoritarian alternative. And we in the news media, collectively, have given equal, if not slightly more favorable, treatment to the authoritarians.”

Misguided mindset?

So this is the mindset: Biden may have his flaws, but Trump is basically evil (Milbank runs through Covid, election fraud, Jan. 6, etc.). If the media are equally tough on Biden and Trump, they are choosing the “wrong” side. Ergo, journalists must ease up on Biden.


This is exactly the approach that has cost the media so much credibility over the last half-dozen years. Milbank is arguing that the stakes are so high that journalists must be activists, that they have an obligation to tilt the playing field toward a preferred outcome. And that is what has undermined the profession.

President Biden is seen outside the White House before boarding Marine One in Washington, Friday, July 30, 2021. 
(Getty Images)

How is it that we haven’t learned this lesson? The solid reporting on Trump has certainly made clear what he did, but the overtly hostile hasn’t convinced anyone who doesn’t already hate the guy.

Ross Douthat, the New York Times conservative and no fan of Trump, says it is “this view of the press’s role that actually empowers demagogues, feeds polarization and makes crises in our system much more likely.”

He contends “the essential problem with the idea that just a little less media neutrality, a little more overt alarmism, would put Trumpism in its place. You can’t suppress a populist insurgency just by rallying the establishment if suspicion of the establishment is precisely what’s generating support for populism in the first place.”


And if Biden’s coverage has turned pretty grim, says Douthat, “it’s turned grim for reasons that an objective and serious press corps would need to acknowledge in order to have any credibility at all.”

President Joe Biden speaks in the State Dining Room of the White House, Monday, Oct. 4, 2021.

President Joe Biden speaks in the State Dining Room of the White House, Monday, Oct. 4, 2021.
(Associated Press)

Again, I don’t accept the notion that, for all of Biden’s missteps, the press has vilified him with Trump-like passion. But what the mainstream media have done has backfired big time.

Footnote: Dana Milbank has, on the other hand, offered a touching tribute to his boss, Washington Post Editorial Page Editor Fred Hiatt, who recently died unexpectedly at age 66. Fred is an old friend who was smart, warm, gracious and a first-class human being – and when his regular conservative columnists turned against Trump, he made sure to recruit some pro-Trump voices.

Most Popular

OPINION: How public transport will evolve in 2023

Dave Rayner (pictured), director of service solutions at Cubic Transportation Systems, looks at trends in traveler information and payment platforms that are creating seamless,...

Paccar takes deliberate approach to electrification

Look up the word deliberation in a dictionary. It perfectly describes Paccar’s approach to trucking electrification. Sure, the company offers nine commercial electric trucks...

Riyadh Airports Company reports 22% December international passenger growth over December 2019

Airport General ManagerHartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International AirportBalram Bheodari leads Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport as North America’s most efficient airport, due to his vast knowledge of...

Germany prepares for nationwide highly automated parking

Following the approval late last year of the use of highly automated parking in the P6 garage at Germany’s Stuttgart Airport, parking operator APCOA and...